<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: organizing your sermon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://kenhensley.com/organizing-your-sermon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://kenhensley.com/organizing-your-sermon/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on life, faith, and other things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:57:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ken		</title>
		<link>https://kenhensley.com/organizing-your-sermon/#comment-2143</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 22:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenhensley.com/?p=1017#comment-2143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://kenhensley.com/organizing-your-sermon/#comment-2141&quot;&gt;James Wood&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi James, thanks for reading and sharing several good points!  I like what Fred Craddock says (and I&#039;ll paraphrase): don&#039;t get married to one type of form or structure.  Allowing the text to breathe is a challenge when we want to get on with speaking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://kenhensley.com/organizing-your-sermon/#comment-2141">James Wood</a>.</p>
<p>Hi James, thanks for reading and sharing several good points!  I like what Fred Craddock says (and I&#8217;ll paraphrase): don&#8217;t get married to one type of form or structure.  Allowing the text to breathe is a challenge when we want to get on with speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James Wood		</title>
		<link>https://kenhensley.com/organizing-your-sermon/#comment-2141</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Wood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kenhensley.com/?p=1017#comment-2141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like a lot of what Andy Stanley does and says. I think this sermon outline is good (it&#039;s not great). My big issue is that when I listen to him, I don&#039;t want to preach like him. He does his one-point thing (which I think is good), but he belabors that point like he&#039;s putting on an SNL sketch. I was annoyed and bored 10 minutes into a 40 minute sermon. 

I totally resonate with the one-point  idea. Too many sermons are ruined when the preacher tries to say too much. However I think the order should be more like: God, Me, We, You, Us. I want to start with seeking God (and I typically try  to preach through a book, so the one point is coming from the text, not my opinions) and then see where he&#039;s leading us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like a lot of what Andy Stanley does and says. I think this sermon outline is good (it&#8217;s not great). My big issue is that when I listen to him, I don&#8217;t want to preach like him. He does his one-point thing (which I think is good), but he belabors that point like he&#8217;s putting on an SNL sketch. I was annoyed and bored 10 minutes into a 40 minute sermon. </p>
<p>I totally resonate with the one-point  idea. Too many sermons are ruined when the preacher tries to say too much. However I think the order should be more like: God, Me, We, You, Us. I want to start with seeking God (and I typically try  to preach through a book, so the one point is coming from the text, not my opinions) and then see where he&#8217;s leading us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
